INDIA FIRST . SATYA DARSHAN . ASHUTOSH
HIGHLIGHT FIRST:
The Avatar Story, Kaliyuga, and the Biggest Misconception of Sanatan Consciousness
After the Mahabharata, dharma was not established; the Kaliyuga, the age of unrighteousness, arrived.
Avatars increased, Hindus decreased.
Stories of reconciliation, war, and resolution created confusion.
Who sent the unrighteous demons before the incarnation?
When the questions stopped, Sanatan stopped.
The Mahabharata was called a “Dharma Yudh.”
Krishna was called “God.”
And the war was described as a means of “establishing Dharma.”
But the stories and history themselves suggest otherwise.
After the Mahabharata:
• The Yadu dynasty was destroyed
• Krishna himself met his end
• Dwarka sank into the sea
• Characters like Samba crossed the limits of unrighteousness
And finally, the scriptures themselves declared—
The Kali Yuga had begun.
This raises the most obvious question:
If the Mahabharata was meant to establish dharma,
where did dharma come from?
What was the purpose of the war that declared the “Adharma Yuga”?
The aftermath of the war was a void: not dharma, but disintegration
If the Mahabharata was a victory of Dharma, then afterward:
• Why did society not achieve stability?
• Why did the Sanatan system not strengthen?
• Why did the art of warfare, statecraft, and social balance collapse?
The reality is that:
• Almost all Sanatan warriors were killed in the Mahabharata.
• Along with them, the knowledge of weapons, martial arts, and defense traditions were destroyed.
• Sanatan society weakened from within.
If Dharma protects, then why did society become even weaker afterward?
Reconciliation or war? The conflict of incarnation stories (Revised analysis)
Rama and Ravana
• Vishnu’s incarnation, Rama, arrived with an army, intent on avenging Sita’s insult.
• But the same Rama sent a peace proposal through Angada.
This raises the question:
• If the objective was to avenge Sita’s insult, why reconciliation?
• If Ravana had agreed, what would have happened to Sita’s insult?
• What would have been the point of gathering an army for war?
Krishna and Duryodhana
• After Draupadi’s disrobing, the Pandavas had made a vow.
• Yet, Vishnu avatar Krishna went to Duryodhana to ask for reconciliation of five villages.
The question here is the same:
• If Duryodhana had agreed, what justice would have been given to Draupadi’s insult?
• Was this justice or political calculation?
This very duality—
first the story of war, then the proposal of reconciliation—
confuses the eternal consciousness.
Rama and Krishna’s “plot to prove themselves great”
This is the myth-illusion in which Hindus are still entangled today—
and this very illusion has been the cause of their downfall
.
Prithviraj Chauhan: Compassion or incarnation-illusion?
Prithviraj Chauhan’s repeated forgiveness of Mohammad Ghori is often called “righteous conduct.”
But the revised question is:
• Was it wisdom or mental inertia born of stories like Rama and Krishna?
• How costly was the race to prove oneself “great”?
The consequences of this delusion:
• Thousands of rapes
• Millions of murders
• Cultural destruction of an entire region
And an important question:
• Was Prithviraj fighting the battle alone?
• Or was his army also with him, which eventually grew weary, wondering, “How long will we continue to conquer and then let the enemy go?”
Ultimately:
• The army’s morale was broken,
• Prithviraj was defeated,
• And Ghori did not make the foolish attempt to display any “greatness.”
Result:
The history of the Hindu region was forever transformed into Islamic history.
Kali Yuga and the decline of Sanatana
In the Kaliyuga that followed the Mahabharata:
• Sanatan society fragmented into sects, cults, and beliefs.
• What was once a global civilization shrank geographically.
• Today, Sanatan is confined to a limited region.
The question is clear:
Why did the number of followers of the religion decrease after each incarnation?
If incarnations were the solution,
then why does the result appear to be the opposite?
The story of victory and victory: justice or a pre-planned plot?
The Puranas state:
• Jaya and Vijaya were Vishnu’s gatekeepers.
• Due to a curse, they became demons on Earth.
• Others became: Hiranyaksha, Hiranyakashipu, Ravana, Kumbhakarna, Shishupala, and Dantavakra.
The question isn’t whether they were demons or not,
the question is:
• Should innocent people have to suffer the punishment for their “curse-redemption”?
• Is it fair that society should bear the penalty for the flaws in the divine order?
If unrighteousness originates
from within that very system,
then what were the incarnations trying to destroy?
Kaal Bhairav and Moral U-turns
Kaal Bhairav in the Sanatan tradition—
the destroyer of falsehood and ego.
But note:
• Kalbhairav, who punishes the arrogant, was called a “sinner.”
• And tolerating falsehood was made a “tradition.”
This is the most dangerous reversal:
Punishing falsehood is considered a sin,
and tolerating falsehood is considered a virtue.
This is where the eternal consciousness becomes confused instead of decisive.
Today’s situation: Waiting, decline, and dependence
Today’s Hindu society:
• Relies on incarnations and the government
• Postpones decisions even in the face of real dangers
• Instead of discernment, is entangled in stones, planets, fasts, and worship
This is not religion,
This is an escape from decision.
Final warning: If questions end, slavery will be permanent.
This is why:
• If Sanatan ends,
• Questions will end.
And once the questions are over:
• Cults and religions already disconnected from Shiva-Truth
• It will be easier to enslave them to the AI-GOD/command-based regime of the future
Bookish religions, which live in the hope of life after death,
have no concern for the freedom of this life—
so it would be easy to turn them into machine-order-driven humans.
Conclusion
Vishnu incarnations kept coming—
the Sanatani consciousness, which knew the essence of Shiva and the essence of truth,
kept diminishing.
The establishment of religion kept being announced,
and unrighteousness kept being established.
Avatars and governments kept coming,
but Hinduism kept shrinking.
Even now we rely on incarnations and governments.
Why only the last incarnation—Kalki?
Why not after that?
Is the answer to this—
that after that, there will be no believers left who believe in the incarnation story?
Just think about it.
Disclaimer
This article is a philosophical, historical, and symbolic discussion.
It is not intended to spread hatred against any religion, community, or individual,
but to encourage questions, discretion, and introspection.
INDIAFIRST.ONLINE
